|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maya Rkell
   |
Posted - 2006.04.23 14:20:00 -
[1]
Faith and loyalty to a mistake in not setting up an agreement they could live with. A war they indend to wage on industrialists and any who are associated with them working to build the economy of the Providence region.
That CC and now CDC are declaring your cause just should give the CVA pause more than anyhting ISS have said. Consider who they are, CVA, and consider the naked face of ambition. Turn away from this course before you are paid in fire and flame.
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.23 15:55:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Archbishop
I will also ask would the ISS be willing to change their regulations regarding letting pirates and terrorist Minmatar (in particular UshraKhan) using the outpost as long as they are neutral? This is as you realize a major concern for loyal Amarrians dedicated to our Empire. We would not want to see an ISS outpost used as a terrorist staging base.
Sigh.
The CVA and PIE have talked about ISS violating its charter. I don't believe it has, so far.
However, THIS idea is in clear breach of the ISS charter and it is quite unreasonable to bring it up. The entire term "pirate" is extremely vague, and seems to be based on a NBSI RoE. However, most closed-space alliances also operate a NBSI RoE. And then you have people like us, who are sometimes labled pirates but operate a strict NRDS policy (we don't even shoot pilots in non-pod pilot lead corps unless they hang arround our ships and ignore requests to move on).
Given you have your own outposts in the area, I'd suggest just shooting your enemies where you find them and accept the fact that you won't be able to dock at the ISS station.
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.23 17:43:00 -
[3]
Why would the ISS sell materials they've spent months hauling in place?
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.23 17:54:00 -
[4]
Except ISS have commited to building 2 stations in Providence. This would mean that they needed to spend another 2 months hauling materials down for another. 2 months hauling puts the price of the materials up, WAY up and sets back the ISS sehedule significantly.
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.23 20:26:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Reash
As ISS policy stands an ISS force in our area of providence would only help to destabilise the area as the ISS could be used as a staging point.
In other words, true free trade is a threat to your cosy little world. Gee!
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.23 20:27:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Reash
As ISS policy stands an ISS force in our area of providence would only help to destabilise the area as the ISS could be used as a staging point.
In other words, true free trade is a threat to your cosy little world. Gee!
NurAbSal, and neither is settling for a far worse location for the outpost.
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.23 20:41:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Tharrn
I still don't get why free trade cannot take place a few jumps further.
Why do I even get involved... probably because it all just doesn't make sense. The soultion is there for days already: CVA helps to move the materials as suggested. ISS has an Outpost in unclaimed Providence, everyone is happy.
Given your demonstrated bad faith, bluntly ISS cannot take the security risk of you moving things for them. Or they'd be uterly insane to do so.
Further, you evidently have no idea about how to do traderoute analyses or how ISS picked that particular system for a station, but moving it to somwehere which seems logical and nearby can crush operating profits because far elss people will visit.
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
|
|
| |
|